= Emerging. More than 5 years before clinical availability. (19.79%)
= Expected to be clinically available in 1 to 4 years. (37.97%)
= Clinically available now. (42.25%)
MSACL 2022 : Moehnke

MSACL 2022 Abstract

Self-Classified Topic Area(s): Proteomics > none > none

Podium Presentation in De Anza 3 on Wednesday at 14:00 (Chair: Karen Phinney / Andrew T Nelson)

Internal Standard Approaches: Stable Isotope-labeled Intact, Winged or Peptide

Kayla L. Moehnke, M.S., MLS(ASCP); Paula M. Ladwig, M.S., MT(ASCP); Anthony D. Maus, Ph.D.; Maria A. V. Willrich, Ph.D.; Melissa R. Snyder, Ph.D.
Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Division of Clinical Biochemistry and Immunology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA

Kayla Moehnke (Presenter)
Mayo Clinic

Presenter Bio: I have been employed at the Mayo Clinic, in Rochester, MN for 14 years. I obtained a bachelor's degree in Medical Laboratory Science and subsequent master's degree of same discipline, both from the University of North Dakota. I am board certified for the American Society of Clinical Pathology. My current academic rank is Instructor of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology. I have been practicing mass spectrometry for just over 1 year.


Best practice for protein quantitation is use of full-length protein stable isotope-labeled internal (protein-SIL) standards to correct for variations in sample preparation, processing (including digestion), matrix effects, and instrument performance. At times protein-SIL internal standards may not be feasible for use, especially during test development due to the lack of commercially available products and the expense of protein-SIL production. The use of winged-SIL and peptide-SIL may be a viable option, but must be carefully evaluated to ensure accurate patient results.

To evaluate the effectiveness of different internal standard approaches using a validated test method and a test method currently in development.

Winged-SIL (TNGSPRLLIKYASESMSGIP*SR*FSGSG), and peptide-SIL (YASESMSGIP*SR) were compared to our current protein-SIL (infliximab 13C6, 14N¬4, Sigma) utilized as the internal standard in our test method for infliximab quantitation by peptide LC-MS/MS. Briefly, sample and IS were added to a filter plate and enriched using Melon™ Gel (Thermo Fisher). The enrichment was digested and analyzed by LC-MS/MS (Sciex API 5000).

Winged-SIL (SVNGKEDAIWNL*LRQAQ and DKSPKFQLFGSPSGQK*DLLFK) and peptide-SIL (EDAIWNL*LR and FQLFGSPSGQK*DL) were utilized during the development of a new test method for lactoferrin. Stool samples (1 g) were extracted with a solution of water:isopropyl alcohol:formic acid (50:33:17) and vigorously vortexed for 10 minutes to lyse cells and form a homogenous solution. After addition of IS, reduction, alkylation, and trypsin digestion were performed. The samples were injected and analyzed by HPLC-MS/MS (Sciex API 6500+).

For infliximab, within-run precision and bias (N=24, 10 mg/mL expected) were acceptable with the protein-SIL (10.0 mg/mL, 3.2% error) but showed more variation for both the winged-SIL (11.8 mg/mL, 21% error) and peptide-SIL (16.2 mg/mL, 31% error). Bias was also evaluated for 24 residual patient comparisons. The protein-SIL showed comparable results with reported; -3.9% difference, range 0.1 to -6.7%. The use of the winged-SIL also gave an acceptable bias; 0.7% difference, range 10% to -11%. The use of peptide-SIL gave unacceptable bias; 32% difference, range 7.9% to 48%.

For lactoferrin, 30 replicates of 4 stool samples were measured, to compare the precision of winged-SIL and peptide-SIL internal standards. We found that winged-SIL were generally advantageous compared to peptide-SIL, but the results were not as conclusive as those outlined above for infliximab. For example, the %CVs for the IS corrected intensity were generally 3X lower for the FQLFGSPSGQKDL target peptide when using winged-SIL compared to peptide-SIL. However, one sample exhibited atypically high %CV when using winged-SIL. For the EDAIWNLLR target peptide the difference in %CV between winged-SIL and peptide-SIL was much closer, ranging from 20% worse to 50% improvement.

The infliximab study confirms that the use of protein-SIL internal standards is best practice for a quantitative protein or peptide mass spectrometry test method, with winged-SIL peptides providing significant benefits over peptide-SIL. Although more exploration is needed to form a definitive conclusion and achieve desired reproducibility criteria, our lactoferrin results suggest that winged-SIL are a much better surrogate for protein-SIL than peptide-SIL. When obtaining protein-SIL is not feasible, winged-SIL peptides provide advantages relative to confirmation of peak picking/retention time and digestion during assay development. The totality of these data demonstrates the advantages of using protein-SIL when possible. The extent to which winged-SIL is viable as an alternative to protein-SIL must be carefully assessed analytically and in the context of the clinical implications for each testing scenario.

Financial Disclosure

Board Memberno
IP Royaltyno

Planning to mention or discuss specific products or technology of the company(ies) listed above: